DVBCWPD2 ;ALB/ESW PTSD WKS TEXT - 2 ; 10 Oct 2000
;;2.7;AMIE;**34**;Apr 10, 1995
;
;
TXT ;
;;
;;F. Assessment of PTSD
;;
;; * state whether or not the veteran meets the DSM-IV stressor criterion
;; * identify behavioral, cognitive, social, affective, or somatic change
;; veteran attributes to stress exposure
;; * describe specific PTSD symptoms present (symptoms of trauma
;; re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, heightened physiological arousal,
;; and associated features [e.g., disillusionment and demoralization])
;; * specify onset, duration, typical frequency, and severity of symptoms
;;
;;G. Psychometric Testing Results
;;
;; * provide psychological testing if deemed necessary.
;; * provide specific evaluation information required by the rating board or
;; on a BVA Remand.
;; * comment on validity of psychological test results
;; * provide scores for PTSD psychometric assessments administered
;; * state whether PTSD psychometric measures are consistent or inconsistent
;; with a diagnosis of PTSD, based on normative data and established
;; "cutting scores" (cutting scores that are consistent with or supportive
;; of a PTSD diagnosis are as follows: PCL - not less than 50;
;; Mississippi Scale - not less than 107; MMPI PTSD subscale a score
;; greater than 28; MMPI code type: 2-8 or 2-7-8)
;; * state degree of severity of PTSD symptoms based on psychometric data
;; (mild, moderate, or severe)
;; * describe findings from psychological tests measuring other than
;; PTSD (MMPI, etc.)
;;
;;H. Diagnosis:
;;
;; 1. The Diagnosis must conform to DSM-IV and be supported by the findings
;; on the examination report.
;; 2. If there are multiple mental disorders, delineate to the extent possible
;; the symptoms associated with each and a discussion of relationship.
;; 3. Evaluation is based on the effects of the signs and symptoms on
;; occupational and social functioning.
;;
;; NOTE: VA is prohibited by statute from paying compensation for a disability
;; that is a result of the veteran's own ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE, whether based
;; on direct service connection, secondary service connection, or aggravation
;; by a service-connected condition. Therefore, when alcohol or drug abuse
;; accompanies or is associated with another mental disorder, separate,
;; to the extent possible, the effects of the alcohol or drug abuse from
;; the effects of the other mental disorder(s). If it is not possible
;; to separate the effects, explain why.
;;
;;I. Diagnostic Status
;;
;; Axis I disorders
;; Axis II disorders
;; Axis III disorders
;; Axis IV (psychosocial and environmental problems)
;; Axis V (GAF score - current)
;;
;;J. Global Assessment or Functioning (GAF):
;;
;; NOTE: The complete multi-axial format as specified by DSM-IV may be required
;; by BVA REMAND or specifically requested by the rating specialist. If so,
;; include the GAF score and note whether it refers to current functioning.
;; A BVA REMAND may also request, in addition to an overall GAF score,
;; that a separate GAF score be provided for each mental disorder present when
;; there are multiple Axis I or Axis II diagnoses and not all are service-
;; connected. If separate GAF scores can be given, an explanation and
;; discussion of the rationale is needed. If it is not possible, an explanation
;; as to why not is needed. (See the above note pertaining to alcohol or drug
;; abuse, the effects of which cannot be used to assess the effects of
;; a service-connected condition.)
;;
;; DSM-IV is only for application from 11/7/96 on. Therefore, when applicable
;; note whether the diagnosis of PTSD was supportable under DSM-III-R prior
;; to that date.
;;
;;K. Competency:
;;
;; Competency, for benefits purposes, has a special meaning,
;; and refers ONLY to veterans' ability to manage benefit payments in their own
;; best interests without restriction, and not to any other subject. State
;; whether the veteran is capable of managing his/her or her benefit payments
;; in the individual's own best interests (a physical disability which prevents
;; the veteran from attending to financial matters in person is not a proper
;; basis for a finding of incompetency unless the veteran is, by reason of that
;; disability, incapable of directing someone else in handling the individual's
;; financial affairs).
;;
;;L. Other Opinion:
;;
;; Furnish any other specific opinion requested by the rating
;; board or BVA remand (furnish the complete rationale and citation of medical
;; texts or treatise supporting opinion, if medical literature review was
;; undertaken). If the requested opinion is medically not ascertainable
;; on exam or testing please state WHY. If the requested opinion can not be
;; expressed without resorting to speculation or making improbable assumptions
;; say so, and explain why. If the opinion asks "... is it at least as likely
;; as not..", fully explain the clinical findings and rationale for the opinion.
;;
;;M. Integrated Summary and Conclusions
;;
;;- Describe changes in PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTIONAL STATUS and QUALITY of LIFE
;; following trauma exposure (performance in employment or schooling, routine
;; responsibilities of self care, family role functioning, physical health,
;; social/interpersonal relationships, recreation/leisure pursuits)
;;- Describe linkage between PTSD symptoms and aforementioned changes in
;; impairment in functional status and quality of life.
;; Particularly in cases where a veteran is unemployed, specific details about
;; the effects of PTSD and its symptoms on employment are especially
;; important.
;;- If possible, describe extent to which disorders other than PTSD
;; (e.g., substance use disorders) are independently responsible for impairment
;; in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life. If this is not possible,
;; explain why (e.g., substance use had onset after PTSD and clearly is a means
;; of coping with PTSD symptoms).
;;- If possible, describe pre-trauma risk factors or characteristics that may
;; have rendered the veteran vulnerable to developing PTSD subsequent to trauma
;; exposure.
;;- If possible, state prognosis for improvement of psychiatric condition
;; and impairments in functional status.
;;- Comment on whether veteran should be rated as competent for VA purposes
;; in terms of being capable of managing his/her benefit payments in his/her
;; own best interest.
;;
;;
;;Signature: Date:
;;END
--- Routine Detail --- with STRUCTURED ROUTINE LISTING ---[H[J[2J[HDVBCWPD2 6938 printed Dec 13, 2024@01:53:09 Page 2
DVBCWPD2 ;ALB/ESW PTSD WKS TEXT - 2 ; 10 Oct 2000
+1 ;;2.7;AMIE;**34**;Apr 10, 1995
+2 ;
+3 ;
TXT ;
+1 ;;
+2 ;;F. Assessment of PTSD
+3 ;;
+4 ;; * state whether or not the veteran meets the DSM-IV stressor criterion
+5 ;; * identify behavioral, cognitive, social, affective, or somatic change
+6 ;; veteran attributes to stress exposure
+7 ;; * describe specific PTSD symptoms present (symptoms of trauma
+8 ;; re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, heightened physiological arousal,
+9 ;; and associated features [e.g., disillusionment and demoralization])
+10 ;; * specify onset, duration, typical frequency, and severity of symptoms
+11 ;;
+12 ;;G. Psychometric Testing Results
+13 ;;
+14 ;; * provide psychological testing if deemed necessary.
+15 ;; * provide specific evaluation information required by the rating board or
+16 ;; on a BVA Remand.
+17 ;; * comment on validity of psychological test results
+18 ;; * provide scores for PTSD psychometric assessments administered
+19 ;; * state whether PTSD psychometric measures are consistent or inconsistent
+20 ;; with a diagnosis of PTSD, based on normative data and established
+21 ;; "cutting scores" (cutting scores that are consistent with or supportive
+22 ;; of a PTSD diagnosis are as follows: PCL - not less than 50;
+23 ;; Mississippi Scale - not less than 107; MMPI PTSD subscale a score
+24 ;; greater than 28; MMPI code type: 2-8 or 2-7-8)
+25 ;; * state degree of severity of PTSD symptoms based on psychometric data
+26 ;; (mild, moderate, or severe)
+27 ;; * describe findings from psychological tests measuring other than
+28 ;; PTSD (MMPI, etc.)
+29 ;;
+30 ;;H. Diagnosis:
+31 ;;
+32 ;; 1. The Diagnosis must conform to DSM-IV and be supported by the findings
+33 ;; on the examination report.
+34 ;; 2. If there are multiple mental disorders, delineate to the extent possible
+35 ;; the symptoms associated with each and a discussion of relationship.
+36 ;; 3. Evaluation is based on the effects of the signs and symptoms on
+37 ;; occupational and social functioning.
+38 ;;
+39 ;; NOTE: VA is prohibited by statute from paying compensation for a disability
+40 ;; that is a result of the veteran's own ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE, whether based
+41 ;; on direct service connection, secondary service connection, or aggravation
+42 ;; by a service-connected condition. Therefore, when alcohol or drug abuse
+43 ;; accompanies or is associated with another mental disorder, separate,
+44 ;; to the extent possible, the effects of the alcohol or drug abuse from
+45 ;; the effects of the other mental disorder(s). If it is not possible
+46 ;; to separate the effects, explain why.
+47 ;;
+48 ;;I. Diagnostic Status
+49 ;;
+50 ;; Axis I disorders
+51 ;; Axis II disorders
+52 ;; Axis III disorders
+53 ;; Axis IV (psychosocial and environmental problems)
+54 ;; Axis V (GAF score - current)
+55 ;;
+56 ;;J. Global Assessment or Functioning (GAF):
+57 ;;
+58 ;; NOTE: The complete multi-axial format as specified by DSM-IV may be required
+59 ;; by BVA REMAND or specifically requested by the rating specialist. If so,
+60 ;; include the GAF score and note whether it refers to current functioning.
+61 ;; A BVA REMAND may also request, in addition to an overall GAF score,
+62 ;; that a separate GAF score be provided for each mental disorder present when
+63 ;; there are multiple Axis I or Axis II diagnoses and not all are service-
+64 ;; connected. If separate GAF scores can be given, an explanation and
+65 ;; discussion of the rationale is needed. If it is not possible, an explanation
+66 ;; as to why not is needed. (See the above note pertaining to alcohol or drug
+67 ;; abuse, the effects of which cannot be used to assess the effects of
+68 ;; a service-connected condition.)
+69 ;;
+70 ;; DSM-IV is only for application from 11/7/96 on. Therefore, when applicable
+71 ;; note whether the diagnosis of PTSD was supportable under DSM-III-R prior
+72 ;; to that date.
+73 ;;
+74 ;;K. Competency:
+75 ;;
+76 ;; Competency, for benefits purposes, has a special meaning,
+77 ;; and refers ONLY to veterans' ability to manage benefit payments in their own
+78 ;; best interests without restriction, and not to any other subject. State
+79 ;; whether the veteran is capable of managing his/her or her benefit payments
+80 ;; in the individual's own best interests (a physical disability which prevents
+81 ;; the veteran from attending to financial matters in person is not a proper
+82 ;; basis for a finding of incompetency unless the veteran is, by reason of that
+83 ;; disability, incapable of directing someone else in handling the individual's
+84 ;; financial affairs).
+85 ;;
+86 ;;L. Other Opinion:
+87 ;;
+88 ;; Furnish any other specific opinion requested by the rating
+89 ;; board or BVA remand (furnish the complete rationale and citation of medical
+90 ;; texts or treatise supporting opinion, if medical literature review was
+91 ;; undertaken). If the requested opinion is medically not ascertainable
+92 ;; on exam or testing please state WHY. If the requested opinion can not be
+93 ;; expressed without resorting to speculation or making improbable assumptions
+94 ;; say so, and explain why. If the opinion asks "... is it at least as likely
+95 ;; as not..", fully explain the clinical findings and rationale for the opinion.
+96 ;;
+97 ;;M. Integrated Summary and Conclusions
+98 ;;
+99 ;;- Describe changes in PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTIONAL STATUS and QUALITY of LIFE
+100 ;; following trauma exposure (performance in employment or schooling, routine
+101 ;; responsibilities of self care, family role functioning, physical health,
+102 ;; social/interpersonal relationships, recreation/leisure pursuits)
+103 ;;- Describe linkage between PTSD symptoms and aforementioned changes in
+104 ;; impairment in functional status and quality of life.
+105 ;; Particularly in cases where a veteran is unemployed, specific details about
+106 ;; the effects of PTSD and its symptoms on employment are especially
+107 ;; important.
+108 ;;- If possible, describe extent to which disorders other than PTSD
+109 ;; (e.g., substance use disorders) are independently responsible for impairment
+110 ;; in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life. If this is not possible,
+111 ;; explain why (e.g., substance use had onset after PTSD and clearly is a means
+112 ;; of coping with PTSD symptoms).
+113 ;;- If possible, describe pre-trauma risk factors or characteristics that may
+114 ;; have rendered the veteran vulnerable to developing PTSD subsequent to trauma
+115 ;; exposure.
+116 ;;- If possible, state prognosis for improvement of psychiatric condition
+117 ;; and impairments in functional status.
+118 ;;- Comment on whether veteran should be rated as competent for VA purposes
+119 ;; in terms of being capable of managing his/her benefit payments in his/her
+120 ;; own best interest.
+121 ;;
+122 ;;
+123 ;;Signature: Date:
+124 ;;END