- DVBCWPF6 ;ALB/RLC - INITIAL EVAL PTSD WORKSHEET TEXT ; 05/18/2006 11:00am
- ;;2.7;AMIE;**183**;Apr 10, 1995;Build 8
- ;
- TXT ;
- ;;
- ;;F. Assessment of PTSD
- ;;
- ;; - identify the primary stressor or stressors
- ;; - state whether or not the veteran meets the DSM-IV stressor criterion
- ;; - identify behavioral, cognitive, social, affective, or somatic change(s)
- ;; veteran attributes to stress exposure
- ;; - describe specific PTSD symptoms present (symptoms of trauma
- ;; re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, heightened physiological arousal,
- ;; and associated features [e.g., disillusionment and demoralization])
- ;; - specify onset, duration, typical frequency, and severity of symptoms
- ;; - state whether or not the current symptoms are linked to the identified
- ;; stressor or stressors
- ;;
- ;;G. Psychometric Testing Results
- ;;
- ;; - provide psychological testing if deemed necessary.
- ;; - provide specific evaluation information required by the rating board or
- ;; on a BVA Remand.
- ;; - comment on validity of psychological test results
- ;; - provide scores for PTSD psychometric assessments administered
- ;;TOF
- ;; - state whether PTSD psychometric measures are consistent or inconsistent
- ;; with a diagnosis of PTSD, based on normative data and established
- ;; "cutting scores" (cutting scores that are consistent with or supportive
- ;; of a PTSD diagnosis are as follows: PCL - not less than 50;
- ;; Mississippi Scale - not less than 107; MMPI PTSD subscale a score
- ;; greater than 28; MMPI code type: 2-8 or 2-7-8)
- ;; - state degree of severity of PTSD symptoms based on psychometric data
- ;; (mild, moderate, or severe)
- ;; - describe findings from psychological tests measuring other than
- ;; PTSD (MMPI, etc.)
- ;;
- ;;H. Diagnosis:
- ;;
- ;; 1. The Diagnosis must conform to DSM-IV and be supported by the findings
- ;; on the examination report.
- ;; 2. If there are multiple mental disorders, discuss the relationship with
- ;; PTSD.
- ;; 3. The evaluation is based on the effects of the signs and symptoms on
- ;; occupational and social functioning.
- ;;
- ;; NOTE: VA is prohibited by statute, 38 U.S.C. 1110, from paying compensation
- ;; for a disability that is a result of the veteran's own ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE.
- ;; However, when a veteran's alcohol or drug abuse disability is secondary to
- ;; or is caused or aggravated by a primary service-connected disorder, the
- ;; veteran may be entitled to compensation. See Allen v. Principi, 237 F.3d
- ;; 1368, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2001). Therefore, it is important to determine the
- ;; relationship, if any, between a service-connected disorder and a disability
- ;; resulting from the veteran's alcohol or drug abuse. Unless alcohol or drug
- ;; abuse is secondary to or is caused or aggravated by another mental disorder,
- ;; you should separate, to the extent possible, the effects of the alcohol or
- ;; drug abuse from the effects of the other mental disorder(s). If it is not
- ;; possible to separate the effects in such cases, please explain why.
- ;;
- ;;I. Diagnostic Status
- ;;
- ;; - Axis I disorders
- ;; - Axis II disorders
- ;; - Axis III disorders
- ;; - Axis IV (psychosocial and environmental problems)
- ;; - Axis V (GAF score - current)
- ;;
- ;;J. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF):
- ;;
- ;; NOTE: The complete multi-axial format as specified by DSM-IV may be required
- ;; by BVA REMAND or specifically requested by the rating specialist. If so,
- ;; include the GAF score and note whether it refers to current functioning.
- ;; A BVA REMAND may also request, in addition to an overall GAF score,
- ;; that a separate GAF score be provided for each mental disorder present when
- ;; there are multiple Axis I or Axis II diagnoses and not all are service-
- ;; connected. If separate GAF scores can be given, an explanation and
- ;;TOF
- ;; discussion of the rationale is needed. If it is not possible, an
- ;; explanation as to why not is needed. (See the above note pertaining to
- ;; alcohol or drug abuse.)
- ;;
- ;; DSM-IV is only for application form 11/7/96 on. Therefore, when
- ;; applicable note whether the diagnosis for PTSD was supportable under
- ;; DSM-III-R prior to that date.
- ;;
- ;;K. Capacity to Manage Financial Affairs
- ;;
- ;; Mental competency, for VA benefits purposes, refers only to the ability
- ;; of the veteran to manage VA benefit payments in his or her own best
- ;; interest, and not to any other subject. Mental incompetency,
- ;; for VA benefits purposes, means that the veteran, because of injury
- ;; or disease, is not capable of managing benefit payments in his or her
- ;; best interest. In order to assist raters in making a legal determination
- ;; as to competency, please address the following:
- ;;
- ;; What is the impact of injury or disease on the veteran's ability
- ;; to manage his or her financial affairs, including consideration
- ;; of such things as knowing the amount of his or her VA benefit
- ;; payment, knowing the amounts and types of bills owed monthly,
- ;; and handling the payment prudently? Does the veteran handle
- ;; his or her money and pay the bills?
- ;;
- ;; Based on your examination, do you believe that the veteran is
- ;; capable of managing his or her financial affairs?
- ;; Please provide examples to support your conclusion.
- ;;
- ;; If you believe a Social Work Service assessment is needed before
- ;; you can give your opinion on the veteran's ability to manage his
- ;; or her financial affairs, please explain why.
- ;;
- ;;L. Other Opinion:
- ;;
- ;; Furnish any other specific opinion requested by the rating
- ;; board or BVA remand (furnish the complete rationale and citation of medical
- ;; texts or treatise supporting opinion, if medical literature review was
- ;; undertaken). If the requested opinion is medically not ascertainable
- ;; on exam or testing please state why. If the requested opinion cannot be
- ;; expressed without resorting to speculation or making improbable assumptions
- ;; say so, and explain why. If the opinion asks "...is it at least as likely
- ;; as not..", fully explain the clinical findings and rationale for the
- ;; opinion.
- ;;
- ;;M. Integrated Summary and Conclusions
- ;;
- ;; - Describe changes in psychosocial functional status and quality of life
- ;; following trauma exposure (performance in employment or schooling,
- ;; routine responsibilities of self care, family role functioning, physical
- ;; health, social/interpersonal relationships, recreation/leisure pursuits)
- ;;TOF
- ;; - Describe linkage between PTSD symptoms and aforementioned changes in
- ;; impairment in functional status and quality of life.
- ;; Particularly in cases where a veteran is unemployed, specific
- ;; details about the effects of PTSD and its symptoms on employment
- ;; are especially important.
- ;; - If possible, describe extent to which disorders other than PTSD
- ;; (e.g., substance use disorders) are independently responsible for
- ;; impairment in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life. If this is
- ;; not possible, explain why (e.g., substance use had onset after PTSD
- ;; and clearly is a means of coping with PTSD symptoms).
- ;;
- ;; - If possible, describe pre-trauma risk factors or characteristics that
- ;; may have rendered the veteran vulnerable to developing PTSD subsequent
- ;; to trauma exposure.
- ;; - If possible, state prognosis for improvement of psychiatric condition
- ;; and impairments in functional status.
- ;; - Comment on whether the veteran is capable of managing his/her
- ;; benefit payments in his/her own best interest.
- --- Routine Detail --- with STRUCTURED ROUTINE LISTING ---[H[J[2J[HDVBCWPF6 8103 printed Mar 13, 2025@20:58:10 Page 2
- DVBCWPF6 ;ALB/RLC - INITIAL EVAL PTSD WORKSHEET TEXT ; 05/18/2006 11:00am
- +1 ;;2.7;AMIE;**183**;Apr 10, 1995;Build 8
- +2 ;
- TXT ;
- +1 ;;
- +2 ;;F. Assessment of PTSD
- +3 ;;
- +4 ;; - identify the primary stressor or stressors
- +5 ;; - state whether or not the veteran meets the DSM-IV stressor criterion
- +6 ;; - identify behavioral, cognitive, social, affective, or somatic change(s)
- +7 ;; veteran attributes to stress exposure
- +8 ;; - describe specific PTSD symptoms present (symptoms of trauma
- +9 ;; re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, heightened physiological arousal,
- +10 ;; and associated features [e.g., disillusionment and demoralization])
- +11 ;; - specify onset, duration, typical frequency, and severity of symptoms
- +12 ;; - state whether or not the current symptoms are linked to the identified
- +13 ;; stressor or stressors
- +14 ;;
- +15 ;;G. Psychometric Testing Results
- +16 ;;
- +17 ;; - provide psychological testing if deemed necessary.
- +18 ;; - provide specific evaluation information required by the rating board or
- +19 ;; on a BVA Remand.
- +20 ;; - comment on validity of psychological test results
- +21 ;; - provide scores for PTSD psychometric assessments administered
- +22 ;;TOF
- +23 ;; - state whether PTSD psychometric measures are consistent or inconsistent
- +24 ;; with a diagnosis of PTSD, based on normative data and established
- +25 ;; "cutting scores" (cutting scores that are consistent with or supportive
- +26 ;; of a PTSD diagnosis are as follows: PCL - not less than 50;
- +27 ;; Mississippi Scale - not less than 107; MMPI PTSD subscale a score
- +28 ;; greater than 28; MMPI code type: 2-8 or 2-7-8)
- +29 ;; - state degree of severity of PTSD symptoms based on psychometric data
- +30 ;; (mild, moderate, or severe)
- +31 ;; - describe findings from psychological tests measuring other than
- +32 ;; PTSD (MMPI, etc.)
- +33 ;;
- +34 ;;H. Diagnosis:
- +35 ;;
- +36 ;; 1. The Diagnosis must conform to DSM-IV and be supported by the findings
- +37 ;; on the examination report.
- +38 ;; 2. If there are multiple mental disorders, discuss the relationship with
- +39 ;; PTSD.
- +40 ;; 3. The evaluation is based on the effects of the signs and symptoms on
- +41 ;; occupational and social functioning.
- +42 ;;
- +43 ;; NOTE: VA is prohibited by statute, 38 U.S.C. 1110, from paying compensation
- +44 ;; for a disability that is a result of the veteran's own ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE.
- +45 ;; However, when a veteran's alcohol or drug abuse disability is secondary to
- +46 ;; or is caused or aggravated by a primary service-connected disorder, the
- +47 ;; veteran may be entitled to compensation. See Allen v. Principi, 237 F.3d
- +48 ;; 1368, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2001). Therefore, it is important to determine the
- +49 ;; relationship, if any, between a service-connected disorder and a disability
- +50 ;; resulting from the veteran's alcohol or drug abuse. Unless alcohol or drug
- +51 ;; abuse is secondary to or is caused or aggravated by another mental disorder,
- +52 ;; you should separate, to the extent possible, the effects of the alcohol or
- +53 ;; drug abuse from the effects of the other mental disorder(s). If it is not
- +54 ;; possible to separate the effects in such cases, please explain why.
- +55 ;;
- +56 ;;I. Diagnostic Status
- +57 ;;
- +58 ;; - Axis I disorders
- +59 ;; - Axis II disorders
- +60 ;; - Axis III disorders
- +61 ;; - Axis IV (psychosocial and environmental problems)
- +62 ;; - Axis V (GAF score - current)
- +63 ;;
- +64 ;;J. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF):
- +65 ;;
- +66 ;; NOTE: The complete multi-axial format as specified by DSM-IV may be required
- +67 ;; by BVA REMAND or specifically requested by the rating specialist. If so,
- +68 ;; include the GAF score and note whether it refers to current functioning.
- +69 ;; A BVA REMAND may also request, in addition to an overall GAF score,
- +70 ;; that a separate GAF score be provided for each mental disorder present when
- +71 ;; there are multiple Axis I or Axis II diagnoses and not all are service-
- +72 ;; connected. If separate GAF scores can be given, an explanation and
- +73 ;;TOF
- +74 ;; discussion of the rationale is needed. If it is not possible, an
- +75 ;; explanation as to why not is needed. (See the above note pertaining to
- +76 ;; alcohol or drug abuse.)
- +77 ;;
- +78 ;; DSM-IV is only for application form 11/7/96 on. Therefore, when
- +79 ;; applicable note whether the diagnosis for PTSD was supportable under
- +80 ;; DSM-III-R prior to that date.
- +81 ;;
- +82 ;;K. Capacity to Manage Financial Affairs
- +83 ;;
- +84 ;; Mental competency, for VA benefits purposes, refers only to the ability
- +85 ;; of the veteran to manage VA benefit payments in his or her own best
- +86 ;; interest, and not to any other subject. Mental incompetency,
- +87 ;; for VA benefits purposes, means that the veteran, because of injury
- +88 ;; or disease, is not capable of managing benefit payments in his or her
- +89 ;; best interest. In order to assist raters in making a legal determination
- +90 ;; as to competency, please address the following:
- +91 ;;
- +92 ;; What is the impact of injury or disease on the veteran's ability
- +93 ;; to manage his or her financial affairs, including consideration
- +94 ;; of such things as knowing the amount of his or her VA benefit
- +95 ;; payment, knowing the amounts and types of bills owed monthly,
- +96 ;; and handling the payment prudently? Does the veteran handle
- +97 ;; his or her money and pay the bills?
- +98 ;;
- +99 ;; Based on your examination, do you believe that the veteran is
- +100 ;; capable of managing his or her financial affairs?
- +101 ;; Please provide examples to support your conclusion.
- +102 ;;
- +103 ;; If you believe a Social Work Service assessment is needed before
- +104 ;; you can give your opinion on the veteran's ability to manage his
- +105 ;; or her financial affairs, please explain why.
- +106 ;;
- +107 ;;L. Other Opinion:
- +108 ;;
- +109 ;; Furnish any other specific opinion requested by the rating
- +110 ;; board or BVA remand (furnish the complete rationale and citation of medical
- +111 ;; texts or treatise supporting opinion, if medical literature review was
- +112 ;; undertaken). If the requested opinion is medically not ascertainable
- +113 ;; on exam or testing please state why. If the requested opinion cannot be
- +114 ;; expressed without resorting to speculation or making improbable assumptions
- +115 ;; say so, and explain why. If the opinion asks "...is it at least as likely
- +116 ;; as not..", fully explain the clinical findings and rationale for the
- +117 ;; opinion.
- +118 ;;
- +119 ;;M. Integrated Summary and Conclusions
- +120 ;;
- +121 ;; - Describe changes in psychosocial functional status and quality of life
- +122 ;; following trauma exposure (performance in employment or schooling,
- +123 ;; routine responsibilities of self care, family role functioning, physical
- +124 ;; health, social/interpersonal relationships, recreation/leisure pursuits)
- +125 ;;TOF
- +126 ;; - Describe linkage between PTSD symptoms and aforementioned changes in
- +127 ;; impairment in functional status and quality of life.
- +128 ;; Particularly in cases where a veteran is unemployed, specific
- +129 ;; details about the effects of PTSD and its symptoms on employment
- +130 ;; are especially important.
- +131 ;; - If possible, describe extent to which disorders other than PTSD
- +132 ;; (e.g., substance use disorders) are independently responsible for
- +133 ;; impairment in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life. If this is
- +134 ;; not possible, explain why (e.g., substance use had onset after PTSD
- +135 ;; and clearly is a means of coping with PTSD symptoms).
- +136 ;;
- +137 ;; - If possible, describe pre-trauma risk factors or characteristics that
- +138 ;; may have rendered the veteran vulnerable to developing PTSD subsequent
- +139 ;; to trauma exposure.
- +140 ;; - If possible, state prognosis for improvement of psychiatric condition
- +141 ;; and impairments in functional status.
- +142 ;; - Comment on whether the veteran is capable of managing his/her
- +143 ;; benefit payments in his/her own best interest.