Home   Package List   Routine Alphabetical List   Global Alphabetical List   FileMan Files List   FileMan Sub-Files List   Package Component Lists   Package-Namespace Mapping  
Routine: DVBCWPG2

DVBCWPG2.m

Go to the documentation of this file.
  1. DVBCWPG2 ;ALB/RLC - REVIEW EXAM PTSD WORKSHEET TEXT ; 05/18/2006 12:00pm
  1. ;;2.7;AMIE;**87**;Apr 10, 1995;Build 6
  1. ;Per VHA Directive 10-92-142, this routine should not be modified
  1. ;
  1. TXT ;
  1. ;;TOF
  1. ;;E. Assessment of PTSD
  1. ;;
  1. ;; - identify behavioral, cognitive, social, affective, or somatic symptoms
  1. ;; veteran attributes to PTSD
  1. ;; - describe specific PTSD symptoms present (symptoms of trauma
  1. ;; re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, heightened physiological arousal,
  1. ;; and associated features [e.g., disillusionment and demoralization])
  1. ;; - specify typical frequency, and severity of symptoms
  1. ;;
  1. ;;F. Psychometric Testing Results
  1. ;;
  1. ;; - provide psychological testing if deemed necessary
  1. ;; - provide specific evaluation information required by the rating board or
  1. ;; on a BVA Remand
  1. ;; - comment on validity of psychological test results
  1. ;; - provide scores for PTSD psychometric assessments administered
  1. ;; - state whether PTSD psychometric measures are consistent or inconsistent
  1. ;; with a diagnosis of PTSD, based on normative data and established
  1. ;; "cutting scores" (cutting scores that are consistent with or supportive
  1. ;; of a PTSD diagnosis are as follows: PCL - not less than 50;
  1. ;; Mississippi Scale - not less than 107; MMPI PTSD subscale a score
  1. ;; greater than 28; MMPI code type: 2-8 or 2-7-8)
  1. ;; - state degree of severity of PTSD symptoms based on psychometric data
  1. ;; (mild, moderate, or severe)
  1. ;; - describe findings from psychological tests measuring other than
  1. ;; PTSD (MMPI, etc.)
  1. ;;
  1. ;;G. Diagnosis:
  1. ;;
  1. ;; 1. The Diagnosis must conform to DSM-IV and be supported by the findings
  1. ;; on the examination report.
  1. ;; 2. If there are multiple mental disorders, discuss the relationship with
  1. ;; PTSD.
  1. ;; 3. The evaluation is based on the effects of the signs and symptoms on
  1. ;; occupational and social functioning.
  1. ;;
  1. ;; NOTE: VA is prohibited by statute, 38 U.S.C. 1110, from paying
  1. ;; compensation for a disability that is a result of the veteran's own
  1. ;; ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE. However, when a veteran's alcohol or drug abuse
  1. ;; disability is secondary to or is caused or aggravated by a primary
  1. ;; service-connected disorder, the veteran may be entitled to compensation.
  1. ;; See Allen v. Principi, 237 F.3d 1368, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2001). Therefore,
  1. ;; it is important to determine the relationship, if any, between a
  1. ;; service-connected disorder and a disability resulting from the veteran's
  1. ;; alcohol or drug abuse. Unless alcohol or drug abuse is secondary to or
  1. ;; is caused or aggravated by another mental disorder, you should separate,
  1. ;; to the extent possible, the effects of the alcohol or drug abuse from
  1. ;; the effects of the other mental disorder(s). If it is not possible
  1. ;; to separate the effects in such cases, please explain why.
  1. ;;TOF
  1. ;;H. Diagnostic Status
  1. ;;
  1. ;; - Axis I disorders
  1. ;; - Axis II disorders
  1. ;; - Axis III disorders
  1. ;; - Axis IV (psychosocial and environmental problems)
  1. ;; - Axis V (GAF score - current)
  1. ;;
  1. ;;I. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF):
  1. ;;
  1. ;; NOTE: The complete multi-axial format as specified by DSM-IV may be required
  1. ;; by BVA REMAND or specifically requested by the rating specialist. If so,
  1. ;; include the GAF score and note whether it refers to current functioning.
  1. ;; A BVA REMAND may also request, in addition to an overall GAF score,
  1. ;; that a separate GAF score be provided for each mental disorder present when
  1. ;; there are multiple Axis I or Axis II diagnoses and not all are service-
  1. ;; connected. If separate GAF scores can be given, an explanation and
  1. ;; discussion of the rationale is needed. If it is not possible, an
  1. ;; explanation as to why not is needed. (See the above note pertaining to
  1. ;; alcohol or drug abuse.)
  1. ;;
  1. ;;J. Capacity to Manage Financial Affairs
  1. ;;
  1. ;; Mental competency, for VA benefits purposes, refers only to the ability
  1. ;; of the veteran to manage VA benefit payments in his or her own best
  1. ;; interest, and not to any other subject. Mental incompetency,
  1. ;; for VA benefits purposes, means that the veteran, because of injury
  1. ;; or disease, is not capable of managing benefit payments in his or her
  1. ;; best interest. In order to assist raters in making a legal determination
  1. ;; as to competency, please address the following:
  1. ;;
  1. ;; What is the impact of injury or disease on the veteran's ability
  1. ;; to manage his or her financial affairs, including consideration
  1. ;; of such things as knowing the amount of his or her VA benefit
  1. ;; payment, knowing the amounts and types of bills owed monthly,
  1. ;; and handling the payment prudently? Does the veteran handle
  1. ;; his or her money and pay the bills?
  1. ;;
  1. ;; Based on your examination, do you believe that the veteran is
  1. ;; capable of managing his or her financial affairs?
  1. ;; Please provide examples to support your conclusion.
  1. ;;
  1. ;; If you believe a Social Work Service assessment is needed before
  1. ;; you can give your opinion on the veteran's ability to manage his
  1. ;; or her financial affairs, please explain why.
  1. ;;
  1. ;;K. Other Opinion:
  1. ;;
  1. ;; Furnish any other specific opinion requested by the rating
  1. ;; board or BVA remand (i.e., furnish the complete rationale and citation of
  1. ;;TOF
  1. ;; medical texts or treatise supporting opinion, if medical literature review
  1. ;; was undertaken). If the requested opinion is medically not ascertainable
  1. ;; on exam or testing please state why. If the requested opinion can not be
  1. ;; expressed without resorting to speculation or making improbable assumptions
  1. ;; say so, and explain why. If the opinion asks "... is it at least as likely
  1. ;; as not..", fully explain the clinical findings and rationale for the
  1. ;; opinion.
  1. ;;
  1. ;;L. Integrated Summary and Conclusions
  1. ;;
  1. ;; 1. Describe changes in psychosocial functional status and quality of life
  1. ;; since the last exam (performance in employment or schooling, routine
  1. ;; responsibilities of self care, family role functioning, physical health,
  1. ;; social/interpersonal relationships, recreation/leisure pursuits)
  1. ;; 2. Describe linkage between PTSD symptoms and aforementioned changes in
  1. ;; impairment in functional status and quality of life.
  1. ;; Particularly in cases where a veteran is unemployed, specific details
  1. ;; about the effects of PTSD and its symptoms on employment are especially
  1. ;; important.
  1. ;; 3. If possible, describe extent to which disorders other than PTSD
  1. ;; (e.g., substance use disorders) are independently responsible for
  1. ;; impairment in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life. If this is
  1. ;; not possible, explain why (e.g., substance use had onset after PTSD
  1. ;; and clearly is a means of coping with PTSD symptoms).
  1. ;; 4. If possible, state prognosis for improvement of psychiatric condition
  1. ;; and impairments in functional status.
  1. ;; 5. Comment on whether the veteran is capable of managing his/her
  1. ;; benefit payments in his/her own best interest.